Skip to Content

RADIAL TO PERIPHERAL

The Impact of Access Site on Patient Quality of Life

Featured: Jan Roczniak, Wojciech Koziołek, Marcin Piechocki, Tomasz Tokarek, Andrzej Surdacki, Stanisław Bartus, and Michał Chyrchel

Explore how radial access can help reduce the risk of complications, and why it is the preferred approach of patients.

Key Takeaways

  • With lower access site complications, radial access was the safest approach compared with brachial access and femoral access.
  • Patient satisfaction was higher with a radial access approach.
  • Radial access represents a preferable approach from the patient’s perspective.

More Resources You Might Be Interested In

Study

Adapting Radial from Cardiac to Lower Extremity Interventions

Featured: Abhisekh Mohapatra, Zein Saadeddin, Efthymios D. Avgerinos, Georges E. Al-Khoury, Eric S. Hager, and Mohammad H. Eslami

Studying the promising outcomes of transradial access for peripheral vascular intervention.

Video Workshop

Radial vs Femoral Access for Peripheral Intervention

Featured: William Beckerman, MD; Imraan Ansaarie, MD

Watch as Dr. William Beckerman outlines case considerations, challenges, safety advantages, patient preference, and the latest therapeutic options in treating PAD and CLI from the radial artery access route.

Brochure

A Different Approach to Your Patient Challenges

Featured: Terumo Interventional Systems

Consider the clinical advantages of radial to peripheral intervention, along with the tools required.